hrdailyreport.com » 2012 » 02EEOC issues guides to avoiding 'caregiver discrimination' » HR Daily Report

EEOC issues guides to avoiding ‘caregiver discrimination’

February 20, 2012 by James Russo
Posted in: Employment law, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News and Views, Legal and compliance

The feds’ new focus: Making sure that employers don’t stifle the careers of employees who have responsibilities for the care of children and other family members.

With that in mind, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has issued two guides — Employer Best Practices for Workers with Caregiving Responsibilities  and Unlawful Disparate Treatment of Workers with Caregiving Responsibilities – that can help employers and their supervisors avoid problems.

Among the information in the guides are the definitions of “caregiver” and “family” that will at the very least help employers understand which employees fall into what has become a new protected category of workers.

Also, the guides warn against a host of prohibited behaviors, including:

  • assuming that female workers’ caretaking responsibilities will interfere with their ability to succeed in a fast-paced environment
  • assuming that female workers who work part-time or take advantage of flexible work arrangements are less committed to their jobs than full-time employees
  • assuming that male workers do not, or should not, have significant caregiving responsibilities
  • assuming that female workers prefer, or should prefer, to spend time with their families rather than time at work
  • assuming that female workers who are caregivers are less capable than other workers
  • assuming that pregnant workers are less reliable than other workers
  • asking female applicants and employees, but not male applicants and employees, about their childcare responsibilities
  • making stereotypical comments about pregnant workers or female caregivers
  • treating female workers without caregiving responsibilities more favorably than female caregivers, and
  • denying male workers’, but not female workers’, requests for leave related to caregiving responsibilities.

 

Tags: , , ,

Comments are closed.


advertisement

Research



advertisement

See what readers are saying...

  • Isabelle Downing: I am currently managing quite a few employees who are older than I am. This was a very interesting and helpful article....
  • Josh: So for example; my company has more than 150 employees and defines full-time status as regular hours of 35 per week. If ...
  • HR Skeptic: WOW. Giving pot (or any chemical, substance or intoxicant that would cause a reasonable person to be concerned) without...
  • Josh: Was the only reasonable accomodation she requested for the shoes? The only reason I could see to defend the company is t...
  • Josh: What are they wanting to change? This is great information if you had more information about the surveys that were condu...
  • Summer Daza: What our company is using is Time Doctor. Installing this...







a